Showing posts with label Editorials. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Editorials. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Guest Post: Frederick Douglass on the 4th of July and the American Dream, 1852

File:Frederick Douglass c1860s.jpg


I hate to be "that guy" on a day of national celebration, pointing out the gross inequities and hypocrisies of an otherwise free and prosperous country. Frederick Douglass had no such qualms, however, in his scathing "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?" delivered in Washington D.C. on July 5th, 1852, excerpted here:

What, to the American slave, is your 4th of July? I answer: a day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelly to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are, to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy—a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages. There is not a nation on the earth guilty of practices, more shocking and bloody, than are the people of these United States, at this very hour.
Go where you may, search where you will, roam through all the monarchies and despotisms of the old world, travel through South America, search out every abuse, and when you have found the last, lay your facts by the side of the everyday practices of this nation, and you will say with me, that, for revolting barbarity and shameless hypocrisy, America reigns without a rival.

Is this sentiment only limited to historical American hypocrisy regarding the slave trade, which President Abraham Lincoln abolished after a bloody civil war? Nay - Susan B. Anthony was not to be outdone, with the National Woman Suffrage Association's "Declaration of Rights of the Women of the United States" just 24 years later.

http://news.yahoo.com/y--big-story--lesser-known-truths-about-fourth-of-july.html

As I continue my series on Incarceration in America, here are a couple articles more, food for thought, on this day of liberty. Freedom isn't free - literally and figuratively:


Probation Fees Rise, Firms Profit and the Poor Go to Jail - NYT

Teen on American justice: 'I'm dead' - Sentenced to 162 years in Jail




Friday, June 29, 2012

The Next Bubble

Its been so long since last we... okay, I'll stop.  But seriously, as our three readers know, its been awhile since I've taken the time to put together something substantive for the blog.  Thank goodness for Conflict Revolution's new writers, or Stephen and I might owe more in child support to this whole enterprise than a certain former elected official does to his love child. 

Guess again!
Which brings me to the point about welcoming the new writers I mentioned.  We are happy to benefit from the outstanding contributions of Elaine Chen, who will be helping us with morning updates and assorted other posts, and Nadia Sheikh, who has kindly offered to cross post some content from her excellent blog Nadia in Pakistan.  Thanks Nadia and Elaine, and welcome!

Yet even as Conflict Revolution's platform widens and the blog expands, we can't forget where we came from.  Steve and I have most recently been working on a couple of (mostly) friendly exchanges on topics ranging from inheritance taxes to regulatory burdens, Republican obstruction, and tacky campaign fundraising gimmicks.  Sexy!  But if you're craving some email debate and you just can't wait, see our most recent discussion on plastic bags and global warming.  It's... great.

Now, that promised substantive post. 

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

[Not-so] Love Lockdown, Prologue (1/4): Do Convicted Criminals dream the American dream?

Do convicted criminals dream the American dream?

Sure they do - Just look at freshly sentenced criminals Rajat Gupta (former Goldman board member), R. Allen Stanford (sentenced to 110 years in prison without parole), and of course Grandaddy Ponzi himself, Bernie Madoff. Hell, these guys even lived the American dream, with its fast cars, deep pockets, luxury yachts and diamonds for the ladies in life.

Now, these riches-to-rags storybook characters are scheduled to rot in a Federal penitentiary for the rest of their lives, leaving exponentially more finances and possibly life plans ruined in their wake. All this justice, of course, conducted in order to dissuade other current or would-be criminals from acting...in exactly the only way they know of how to get to the American dream - Get Rich or Die/Go to Jail Trying.

50 Cent was on to something
A rather paradoxical message, given the global rash of government-bank bailouts and the continued reliance on the instruments (i.e. financial markets) of who-dares-wins capitalism. But enough of this suddenly-fashionable bashing of fallen financial idols. It seems like just yesterday when activist judges, juries, and members of the media started defending the rights of convicted rapists, murderers, gang-bangers and the assorted denizens of American death row - new and vindicating/damning DNA evidence notwithstanding - so I'm sure public opinion will grow weary of its latest social witch-hunt sooner or later, and that District Attorneys/Federal Prosecutors will likewise find some other scapegoats upon which to build their reputations on the docket. Sooner or later, our generation's To Kill a Mockingbird of the early 21st century will be published, this time admonishing the veritable inquisition of financial criminals during a time of long-term recession and entrenched unemployment.

Yet even in a time of economic downturn, when Wall Street becomes an easy target of Main Street's wrath, no one seems to be pissing on how the wildly-popular (and mostly plastic) Kardashians, the train-wreck-of-an-excuse-for-a-man Charlie Sheens, or the well-paid, drug-snorting Lindsay Blohan-type celebrities don't pay "their fair share" of American taxes. Plus Justin Bieber- he's CANADIAN!! Where is that money going??

oh...nevermind.

What compelled me to finally write original content for the blog again - and a three-part series, at that - was a combination of many factors, the premier of which was my roommate's comment that, "no offense, but I think the American Dream is more of a Dream than a Reality."

Monday, June 25, 2012

Guest Post: Getting Your Money's Worth

When Nadia Sheikh (Georgetown '09) told her Dean how she hadn't found "gainful employment" despite having both a Bachelor's and Graduate Degree, that Dean joked: "Does she want her money back?"

Nadia is now pursuing a career in international development consulting in Pakistan, where she is keeping a blog journal of her experiences living and working abroad. You can find more of Nadia's writings at nadiainpakistan.blogspot.com, or follow her on twitter (@sheikhandbake).

Getting Your Money's Worth
By Nadia Sheikh

About two months ago, Dean Gillis, the dean of the College at Georgetown University made a pit stop in my hometown of Portland, Oregon. During the Q and A section, my mom raised her hand and told him about my story -- how almost three years post-graduation, I haven't found gainful employment despite honors from Georgetown and now LSE. In his response, first, he made a joke, 'does she want her money back?' Then went on to say that I could contact him.

I sent him a friendly email, explaining my circumstances and how I've done everything in my power to get a job. I interned throughout college (six internships), volunteered post college, had part-time jobs, and did another internship for eight months post college. I went to the career center at LSE and Georgetown for weeks on end, getting appointments whenever they'd let me this past year, gone to every networking and career center event I could possibly go to to meet HR reps, career fairs, 500+ applications, and continued calling and meeting alums on the alumni networks for both schools in the US and even in Pakistan. Why do I not have a job yet? Is it just bad luck? The economy? Interviewing skills? My field of choice? Lack of connections?


Monday, June 4, 2012

CR Sports: Johan Santana Pitches a No-Hitter

The Mets finally threw a no-hitter on Friday night, and I'm writing about it because it's a really big deal.

No, this will not fix the economy, or get Iran to stop pursuing nuclear weapons, or make healthcare any more affordable, or even bring my favorite baseball team any closer to that long-awaited World Series championship that still only exists in my imagination.

But it's a big deal, particularly for a franchise so comically snake-bitten as the Mets. 
   
Regular visitors to this blog know that Stephen and I occasionally use this space to write about sports, as we did recently in considering the subject of ads on American jerseys, and as I felt compelled to after the Giants' thrilling Super Bowl victory.  In my statements on the latter, especially, I tried to place my raw euphoria over the game within the broader context of what it feels like to go through life as a sports fan.  The day after your team wins America's most watched sporting event is different when it's also the team you've followed since you were five years old.

On its own, this would be a rather token observation.  But it's not just the time you put in.  It's what you end up getting for it in the end, and why you're okay with that ultimately being very little. 

Let's be clear: when it comes to emotional peaks and valleys, being a sports fan is a terrible deal.  Even if you root for the best team in any given sport, over the course of your lifetime, you will be disappointed at the end of almost every season.  You will see your team screw up more times than it succeeds.  They will break your heart frequently, and tease you three times for every time they satisfy you once, starting from the moment you initially make the ill-fated decision to base your personal happiness on the trials and tribulations of a bunch of guys playing a game.  It's the sports fan's paradox, but it's really quite simple, and the fate of a multi-billion dollar enterprise depends on it: if more people were less willing to put themselves through such an abusive relationship with their number one choice of entertainment, professional sports would NOT be one of the biggest industries in America.

Thursday, May 31, 2012

Lunchtime Blotter: Romney Hearts the Donald

Apart from those poor Apprentice contestants, Mitt Romney might be the only person in America who takes Donald Trump seriously.  Particularly after his crusade to win the GOP nomination by proving that Barack Obama wasn't born in this country went up in flames around this time last year, with Obama releasing his long-form birth certificate and then utterly embarrassing Trump as he sat stone-faced in the audience at the White House Correspondents Dinner, it seemed as though most Americans who even care had dismissed Trump as the worthless fat gadfly he is.  



Except Mitt Romney.  While the Obama campaign sends out fundraising gimmicks to supporters like me advertising the chance to earn a trip to high dollar dinners with Obama and Bill Clinton, or George Clooney, the Romney team mimicked this tactic with its most marketable celebrity last week, offering supporters the chance to "Dine with the Donald."  Romney's bromance with Trump extends even further back to the dog days of the GOP primaries in February, when the former Massachusetts governor staged an elaborate ceremony to celebrate Trump's endorsement, capping it off by remarking wistfully that “there are some things that you just can’t imagine happening in your life. This is one of them.”  Note that this delight in the endorsement of a bombastic real estate magnate most famous for saying "you're fired!" on TV came during the height of Romney's attempts to endear himself to blue-collar Republican voters who viewed him suspiciously, which might be a curious decision if Romney didn't actually see something in the guy.  The question is, what?

Friday, May 25, 2012

Friday Morning: Not Barry Smooth

Anyone who has actually taken the time to look behind the caricature knows that former DC mayor turned DC city council member Marion Barry is a complex individual.  He is neither the arrogant, race-baiting, crack-addicted fool his detractors make him out to be (despite this), nor the civil rights hero and man of the people portrayed by his most ardent believers.  Probably the best take on Mr. Barry comes from this documentary, which tells the story of one of America's more well-known mayors with the level of nuance it deserves.


On to the good stuff though - yesterday, while doing damage control around his latest kerfuffle, Barry managed to cause another stir.  The whole thing initially started when, at his victory party after winning the April Democratic primary in his Ward, Barry said the following about Asian business owners in the city:
"We got to do something about these Asians coming in and opening up businesses and dirty shops," Barry said. "They ought to go. I'm going to say that right now. But we need African-American businesspeople to be able to take their places, too."
After first doubling down on his comments, and even tweeting a photo in an attempt to further his point, Barry got himself in more trouble by saying the following about Filipino nurses:
In fact, it's so bad, that if you go to the hospital now, you find a number of immigrants who are nurses, particularly from the Philippines. And no offense, but let's grow our own teachers, let's grow our own nurses -- and so that we don't have to be scrounging around in our community clinics and other kinds of places -- having to hire people from somewhere else.
As you might imagine, neither community was particularly happy about Barry's comments, and after a protracted war of attrition between Barry and the media, in which the former mayor accused reporters of trying to "divide the city" through their scrutiny, Barry finally organized a heartfelt press conference with local Asian business leaders yesterday to apologize.  In his apology, Barry tried to contextualize his latest controversy by alluding to other immigrant groups that labored to establish a foothold in America.  See if you can spot the racially insensitive comment:
"America has had racial tensions from the time it was founded," Barry said. "Italians coming here, the Irish came here, the Jews came here, the Polacks came here, the Chinese came here."
There's no word yet on whether or not Barry plans on consulting the city's Polish community on how to handle this most recent round of fallout.  Perhaps he'll tweet about it.  But if the absurd irony of Barry's "bender of racial insensitivity," as Univision's Jordan Fabian described it, has shown one thing, it's that the once high-riding (no pun intended) mayor of the nation's capital has officially lost the ability to get out of his own way.  At this point, following the 76 year-old Barry is like sitting through dinner with your grandparent who still thinks it's okay to say things that aren't okay to say (a friend of mine's grandmother once described sleeveless undershirts - also known irreverently as wife beaters - as "Italian dinner jackets").  You know they can't help it.  You just have to laugh, or something. 

Indeed, people will laugh at Barry's latest misstep and try and fit it once again into the aforementioned caricature of mayor-turned-crack-fiend-turned-federal prisoner-turned-mayor-turned-aging city council member on his way out, but yet again, it will ultimately be Barry who is laughing all the way to his next victory party in four years, if he chooses to run again.  Because while the chattering class might rightfully ridicule how seemingly absurd it is that this man still holds public office, most people fail to appreciate why exactly it is that he is able to get himself in and out of trouble so seamlessly. 

In college, I had the good fortune of attending a community meeting in a Baptist church east of the Anacostia River where Barry was present.  As the councilman for Ward 8, where the meeting was held, Barry was introduced before the meeting began, and the crowd stood on its feet and roared.  He received rock star-level approval.   I wondered - how can a guy who has screwed up so many times, raised and dashed so many hopes, still be given a hero's welcome, time and time again?  Do they cheer like that for Jack Evans over in Ward 2?  To be fair - far from every Ward 8 resident shares the same sentiments, as evidenced by the breadth, if not the depth, of Barry's opposition in this year's Democratic primary.  But it's clear that if nothing else, the former mayor has a special flair for tapping into something very personal on the part of the people he has represented in some capacity for 29 out of the last 37 years.  Granted, he has also betrayed the trust, time and again, of the very folks who have given him chance after chance.  But if, like your eccentric friend who can't quite get it together but who you can't quite cut loose, Barry can keep winning people over, you have to at least wonder how he somehow keeps doing it.

Maybe he should quit while he's still ahead, kind of.  But he won't, and won't have to, because at the end of the day, until someone else comes along that can articulate in as personal terms as Marion Barry why the former mayor has actually used the faith placed in him for his own selfish ends time and time again, while continuing to appeal for that faith on the grounds that he has been unfairly persecuted, even though he has been given every chance in the world and come up short every time, the Barry bender of con artistry will continue unabated.

Perhaps he's not such a complex individual after all. 

Thursday, May 3, 2012

CR Sports: WTF, Caps Fans?!?

Fans of the Washington Capitals are recovering from hockey heartbreak this morning, after the Caps lost in TRIPLE overtime to the New York Rangers last night.  I had the good fortune of watching this game in a bar just outside the Verizon Center arena here in DC, where the Caps play their home games, and while hockey isn't really my sport, given my New York roots I can't say I'm so disappointed in the outcome.

The whole Caps thing down here is pretty interesting.  Hockey is a legitimately big deal.  You can always tell when its Caps game day, because the Washington Metro will be decked out with people dressed in the team's signature red jerseys.  In a sport that only recently got all of its playoff games televised again, competing in a major US market with three other professional sports franchises, including the unfortunate but dearly beloved Washington Redskins, this is no small feat.

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Tommy's Take: The Beginning

Andy Rooney might be dead (RIP), but his spirit lives on in Conflict Revolution's new resident cultural commentator, knowledge purveyor, and peanut gallery season ticket holder Thomas J. Devine.  Tommy's Take will be a new feature here at CR, appearing on a regular basis to enrich your weekday existence with some straight up insight.  And if knowledge does in fact = power, the fact that it's Wednesday and you're reading our blog instead of getting any work done should be no concern at all.  Your mind may well be blown already, but if it isn't, here's Tommy/Tom/Thomas with a better introduction to his column than I could ever possibly muster:

****
There are an incredible amount of blogs on the internet. I’d give you an exact number, but I looked it up and couldn’t find one. Between Tumblr and WordPress, the two most accessible and popular blog hosting services, there are at least one hundred million. Everybody wants to be Editor-in-Chief of their own digital universe.


Conflict Revolution is a tiny drop in a massive sea of blogs in the colossal ocean of the internet. But I’d
be willing to bet that in terms of its unique insight, quality of writing, and personality, this blog ranks somewhere in the top 50 million.

Suffice to say I was floored when I was asked to contribute a weekly column to one of the best blogs
on the internet, especially because I’ve been an ardent supporter of Conflict Revolution from day one. I
was present for the real-life, person to person debates that predated this blog. At times I was an active
participant, other times I looked like a spectator at an ugly and discordant tennis match. I’m glad that
Matt and Steve finally have a structured place to explore in depth their differences of opinion.

My column will touch on policy and politics, but I’ll leave the bulk of the issue analysis to Matt and
Steve. Instead, you can expect a smattering of human interest, art and culture, business, Andy Rooney-esque commentary, and musings on societal trends that I think say something interesting about the human condition.

So here I join the league of internet commentators. The grand Opiners of Opinions. The Pop Culture
Pontificates. Savants of the Soapbox. They-Who-Have-Something-To-Say. You get the point. I won’t
make the mistake, as so many people do today, of inflating the importance of my ideas just because I
have a forum. I keep in mind the advice Jean Sibelius gave to a young composer who felt dejected after a negative review: “Always remember, there is no city in the world which has erected a statue to a critic.” After all, this blog is only one of a hundred million.

-Tommy

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Guest Post: Iraq, Five Months Later

Five months after the last American soldiers left Iraq, the country remains at a crossroads.  This post comes to us from Kennan Khatib, a fellow Georgetown grad and currently a Critical Threats Specialist with the DC-based American Enterprise Institute.  Given Kennan's intricate knowledge of Middle Eastern affairs and foreign policy, we asked him to comment on the state of the fledgling Iraqi democracy, and how Iran factors into the situation. 

**** 
Iran's Got Her Eye on Iraq
By Kennan Khatib 

After nearly eight years of the Iraq War and over 4,000 deaths among U.S. troops, the abrupt end to military operations severely mitigated the gains made following the surge in 2007.[1] While the U.S. accomplished several goals including deposing Saddam, establishing a semi-functional democracy, and eliminating the threat that Iraq posed to its neighbors, Iran is bearing the fruits of America’s labor.


President George W. Bush’s aim of establishing a secular, pro-American democracy slowly crumbled with the election of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki. America’s withdrawal made it even easier for Maliki to separate himself from America’s interests, most notably accepting aid from Iran and picking fights with Turkey.[2] While it is true that America’s relationship with the leadership in Iraq was always shifty, having boots on the ground actualized America’s investment in the future of Iraq and its people. The diplomatic mission in Iraq is strong with nearly 16,000 workers at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, but with al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) still active, albeit severely weakened, in its mission to incite sectarian violence between Shi’is and Sunnis (including the Kurds) paired with Muqtada al Sadr’s Mahdi Army, security remains a major issue.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Raise the Roof? DC Considering Changes to Tall Buildings Restriction


Washington DC's restriction on tall buildings is in the midst of its latest challenge, as city and congressional leaders discuss possible modifications to the 1910 Heights of Buildings Act, which generally restricts construction within the city's radius to no more than 90 feet for residential buildings and 130 feet for commercial structures.  Leading the charge is DC Mayor Vincent Gray, in concert with "congresswoman" Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), who chairs the House committee that controls the city's pursestrings.

Real estate developers have long abhorred the prohibition on taller buildings, which they say limits their ability to develop downtown Washington to its full potential and artificially inflates the price of the city's prime office space.  Additionally, Issa and others believe that relaxing the limit on tall buildings would help lure developers to outlying areas of the city that have historically been neglected but could become candidates for high-rise residential and office buildings.

It should also be noted that the three leaders are not talking about a total repeal of the rule, but what instead seems like a relatively minor change which would allow the addition of another floor or two on top of new and existing structures.